![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
WHAT IF YOU WERE THE PUBLISHER?Demonstrate your best ideas for how scientific research articles should be presented on the web and compete to win great prizes!Contact Us for more information. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONTEST OVERVIEW
Elsevier Labs invited creative individuals who wanted the
opportunity to view and work with journal article content on the web to
enter the Elsevier Article 2.0 Contest. Each contestant was
provided online access to approximately 7,500 full-text XML articles
from Elsevier journals, including the associated images, and the
Elsevier Article 2.0 API to develop a unique yet useful web-based
journal article rendering application.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AWARD WINNERS
Below are the winners of Article 2.0 contest that began on September 1st, 2008 and ended on December 31st, 2008.
First Prize Winner: Inigo Surguy
The web application demonstrates how scientific article publishing can be improved by applying Web 1.0, Web 2.0 and Web 3.0/Semantic Web approaches to add value to article content. The application enhances content navigation, allows commenting on specific paragraphs and features of images, and allows facts to be asserted about the article and its contents.
Second Prize Winner: Jacek Ambroziak
The mobile web application enables reading Elsevier articles on an Android smartphone. The application consists of a server part that accesses the Article 2.0 web services, and a client-side applications to receive and transform the binary XML from the server. The Android application can be installed either on an Android emulator or on an actual G1 phone.
Third Prize Winner: Stuart Chalk
The web application is designed around the idea that a research article is inherently non-linear and therefore researchers viewing such articles will look at them in a stochastic fashion depending upon their interest. The article page presented is one instance of the interface which the user would be able to customize as they needed. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
JUDGES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In association with:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||